Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quality standards"
From Consumer Wiki
(Categories) |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
...as can be seen here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Special:Categories | ...as can be seen here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Special:Categories | ||
| − | I have only added a few into categories so far, to do this you have to type: [[Category:Contact_Details]] (where Contact_Details is the name of the category that the article shoule belong). | + | I have only added a few into categories so far, to do this you have to type: "[[Category:Contact_Details]]" (where Contact_Details is the name of the category that the article shoule belong). |
What others shall I create? | What others shall I create? | ||
Revision as of 16:27, 7 June 2007
suggestions:
A Manual of Style:
- outlining the way to use capitals in titles, for names etc...
- standards for external links
- a template style for template letters (in a template_letter category)
- templates for unfinished or articles requiring clean-up, such as:
- Properly laid out index...(Spicenix)
Would this not be the index?
http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Special:Allpages
or
http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Special:Categories
(when we have the categories sorted with content, then they will ALL appear here rather than just the one that I have created, called 'Contact Details')
Categories
So far I have created:
Bank_Charges Contact_Details Legal_Information
...as can be seen here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Special:Categories
I have only added a few into categories so far, to do this you have to type: "" (where Contact_Details is the name of the category that the article shoule belong).
What others shall I create?
